YOU COULD BE SUED, INDICTED, EVEN SENT TO PRISON AS A DRUG WAR CRIMINAL!
All wars end and eventually the
War on Drugs will end as well. After every war, comes an accounting
of those who violated the human rights of others. Where will you stand
when that judgment day comes? Will you be exonerated or end up spending
the rest of your
You may believe it is your duty
to "do something about the drug problem," but those who violate the human
rights of American citizens will someday be held accountable. That
day is surely coming and it may be sooner than you think. If you
and your fellow officers, no matter how well intentioned, continue to enforce
the failed ideology of Zero Tolerance; you could find yourself spending
One of the most enduring, yet troubling, law enforcement impulses is the tendency for the authorities to view certain 'ends' as so important - stopping drunken driving, locking up dangerous criminals, stemming the flood of illegal drugs - that they are willing to employ ever more questionable 'means' to achieve them. As a result, police have increasing adopted an attitude of an occupying military army whose purpose is to bring order and discipline to a dangerous citizenry. When police think and act like soldiers, they generate mistrust among their constituents, which in turn pushes law enforcement agencies further into an elitist, impersonal enclave. The military mentality, along with machine guns and flash grenades, have no place in a free society.
Just listen to what Joseph D. McNamara, the Retired Police Chief of San Jose and a Research Fellow at the Hoover Institution has to say about the military mentality that has infected the LAPD and police departments across the country:
"The Board of Inquiry report released last week, for all its candor and commendable self criticism, does not cite the department's fundamental military style of policing as responsible for the horrible police crimes alleged by former Officer Rafael Perez, whose disclosures exposed the police misconduct at Rampart. Rather than calling for the development of a new style of policing, the report focuses on internal management practices. It contends that a few rotten apples, binge hiring, inadequate training, haphazard supervision, failure to hold supervisors accountable and other personnel shortcomings were the sources of the problems at Rampart."
Chief McNamara then goes on to warn,
"Greedy" lawyers, not idealism, may thus end up provoking citizens in Los
Angeles to demand that those who enforce the law should also obey it.
When police behave lawfully, people can tell the good guys from the bad.
Judging from the headlines, police departments across this great nation, from Los Angeles to New York City are about to reap the wrath of "Greedy" lawyers. Although no elected officials are yet ready to deal with de-militarizing the LAPD, the L.A. City Council is planning on over $200 million in law suits. That estimate is probably low and doesn't include personal suits against police as well as a tremendous loss of credibility for the police.
Already the LAPD is complaining that the testimony of their officers is no longer taken seriously by juries. When police are no longer credible in a court of law, all police suffer and honest police are left with to deal with the fallout.
Unfortunately, the actions of the police in regards to
Zero Tolerance ideology today is little different than the actions taken
fifty years ago by the German police who were charged with enforcing the
Nazi ideology of anti-Semitism. Old men who obediently enforced laws written
by the Nazis, are still being tracked down and held accountable for their
past human rights violations against the Jewish People.
At least in Nazi Germany, police and guards were following the law. Here in California, where voters passed a law that is supposed to protect medical marijuana patients, the police are NOT following the law. This makes your potential culpability much great, since you could lose any immunity as a police officer for crimes which you should have known were illegal. Under the California Constitution Article 2 Section 10, Prop. 215 legally became the law of California the day after the 1996 election and only the voters can amend or repeal the Compassionate Use Act now that it has passed:
(a) An initiative statute
or referendum approved by a majority of votes thereon TAKES EFFECT THE
DAY AFTER THE
Furthermore, the Compassionate Use Act of 1996, because
it is AN INITIATIVE STATUTE APPROVED BY A MAJORITY OF VOTES, CANNOT BE
LIMITED OR RESTRICTED BY ANYONE, including sheriffs, district attorneys,
the attorney general or
(c) The Legislature. .
.may amend or repeal an initiative statute by another statute that becomes
effective ONLY WHEN
Regardless of what your sheriff or police chief has told you about Prop. 215, Attorney General Lungren, acting in his official capacity, issued a statement to all California voters, in the 1996 California Ballot Guide, Official Title and Summary for Proposition 215, that Prop. 215:
"EXEMPTS: patients and
defined caregivers who possess or cultivate marijuana for medical treatment
recommended by a
No matter what your superiors may tell you, it is your responsibility to uphold ALL the laws, even the ones you don't like. Your boss has no authority to tell you otherwise, because the Constitution of the State of California, Amendment III, Section 3.5 requires ALL officials to uphold The Compassionate Use Act as follows:
"An administrative agency,
including an administrative agency created by the Constitution or an initiative
statute, has no power:
Since no judicial challenge has been filed seeking to invalidate the law on the basis of a conflict with federal laws or regulations, or for any other reason, you are legally obligated to uphold the Compassionate Use Act.
You should also be aware that medical marijuana has now been upheld by Federal court. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled that patients who are seriously ill, may be legally entitled under Federal law to use, possess and distribute medical marijuana:
"In short, OCBC (The Oakland Cannabis Buyers Cooperative) presented evidence that there is a class of people with serious medical conditions for whom the use of cannabis is necessary in order to treat or alleviate those conditions or their symptoms; who will suffer serious harm if they are denied cannabis; and for whom there is no legal alternative to cannabis for the effective treatment of their medical conditions because they have tried other alternatives and have found that they are ineffective, or that they result in intolerable side effects"
These are the facts and the laws regarding your legal duties and obligations. Regardless of what your sheriff or chief tells you, medical marijuana patients are not criminals and they are protected by law. Moreover, you should understand that medical marijuana patients are intelligent and mostly older citizens who are fed up with being abused by law enforcement. Police have never encountered anything like this new breed of older, angrier, and far more persistent citizens who are not afraid to sue or indict police who violate their rights.
Medical marijuana patients are fighting back in increasing numbers. Dozens of lawsuits have already been filed against California officials and police departments and hundreds more are on the way. In Shasta County, the sheriff faces jail if convicted of a conspiracy charge arising from his mishandling of a recent medical marijuana case.
Medical marijuana patients who are also legally disabled, are beginning to charge police with crimes under the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Unruh Civil Rights Act. These laws clearly state that threats against disabled people, in the exercise of their state (medical marijuana) rights or damaging their (medical marijuana) property, are felonies with enhanced penalties if committed by public officials or officers. (See Cal. Pen. Code, §§ 422.6, 422.7 and 422.75.)
Nobody is above the law, not even the Nazis who ruled with impunity during the 1940s. After the end of World War II, those responsible for crimes committed during the Holocaust were brought to trial in Nuremberg, Germany. While many German police and guards pleaded that they were "only following orders," they were all convicted and received severe sentences or executions.
In contrast, high level government officials who played key roles in the Holocaust, received short prison sentences or no penalty at all. Many more criminals were never tried. Some fled Germany to live abroad, including hundreds who came to the United States. Based upon the Nuremberg Trials, you should know that "just following orders," is never a legal excuse for violating human rights. When the drug war ends, you can expect regular officers and guards to get severe sentences, perhaps even executions, while your superiors will get off a hand slap and quiet retirement in Idaho. Worst of all, the top level drug warriors, who corrupted you and your sincere mission to "protect and serve," are probably moving their assets out of the country already to create their retirement paradise abroad.
How would you like to be sent to jail while your bosses are living it up in South America? It happened to the German police and it can happen to you as well. There's still time for you to reform your ways and exonerate yourself. The first step is to read, learn and uphold the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. These documents are written simply and provide clear instructions for protecting the rights of individuals. The brave men and women who gave their lives to defend our Constitution would never have tolerated a drug war. Certainly George Washington and Thomas Jefferson would have opposed this war as treason, especially since both of these highly respected Founding Fathers grew over 100 acres of hemp. Under current U.S. drug laws and mandatory minimums, both Washington and Jefferson would be sentenced to life in prison for growing that much hemp.
Where is your moral tripwire for saying NO to a failed
ideology and insisting on following the Constitution instead? If Washington
and Jefferson were still alive today, would you arrest them for violating
federal law? Would you fire on unarmed American citizens if ordered
to? These are questions only you can decide. Hopefully, you will
give serious consideration to these important issues and you will make
a new commitment to your oath to "Protect and defend the Constitution against
all enemies, foreign and domestic."
Let freedom grow,